Lawrence Board of REALTORS® Releases Home Sales Figures for April 2016

May 23, 2016

April 2016 Sales States Graph

Homes sales rose by 10.5% in April compared to the prior year. Sales in April 2016 totaled 126 units, up from 114 in 2015.

Among existing homes, 117 units sold in April, an increase of 9.3% from 107 units that sold in 2015. The average sale price of existing homes was $188,359. This represents an increase of 0.9% from the April 2015 average price of $186,651.

For new construction, 9 sales occurred in April, up from 7 units the prior year, an increase of 28.6%. The average sale price of new homes in April was $361,771, down 3.5% from the same period last year.

 A total of 174 contracts for sale were written in April 2016, up from 172 in April 2015. This is an increase of 1.2%. Contracts written during the month reflect, in part, sales that will close in the near future.

The inventory of active listings in the City of Lawrence stood at 250 units at the end of April, which is down from 346 homes that were on the market at the end of April last year. At the current rate of sales, this figure represents 2.0 months’ supply of homes on the market.

 According to Carl Cline, President of the Lawrence Board of REALTORS®, “we have tight supply in the Lawrence housing market, especially in the lower price range. High demand in areas of short supply creates competition, drives prices upward, and lowers the amount of time homes remain available in the market. The pace of this market can be challenging for everyone. REALTORS® are in peak performance mode, and are sleeping with one eye open. Buyers need guidance to understand what it takes to compete and be in a position to win. And Sellers are not invincible. Prices are fluid, condition matters, and timing is everything. A well-coordinated listing strategy can result in multiple offers, possibly over list price.”

For questions and/or comments, please contact LBOR President Carl Cline at 785-218-1340 or cmsellm@gmail.com.

Complete statistical summaries for Lawrence and Douglas County are available at http://www.lawrencerealtor.com/market-statistics/.

 

Talking Points on the Public Vote Requirement for Property Tax Increases by Cities and Counties

KAR Talking Points on Public Vote Requirement

What is the public vote requirement?

The public vote requirement means that cities and counties cannot increase property tax revenues over the previous year by more than the rate of inflation (currently averages 2.2% per year) unless the voters residing in the city or county approve the increase by a majority vote at an election.

Referring to the public vote requirement as the “property tax lid” is inaccurate. The public vote requirement does not put a hard cap or lid on property tax increases by cities or counties. Instead, the public vote requirement simply gives voters the right to vote on property tax increases that exceed inflation.

This is not a new or untested idea. The first public vote requirement was enacted in Kansas in 1908 and has been in effect at various times over the last 107 years. 21 states, including our neighboring states of Colorado and Missouri, have adopted the public vote requirement on property tax increases by local governments.

KAR has consistently supported the public vote requirement since the late 1960s. This position was reaffirmed by the Board of Directors in October 2015. KAR led the movement during the 2015 Legislative Session to pass legislation reinstating the public vote requirement.

How will the public vote requirement work and what are the exemptions from the law?

The law simply prevents any city or county from increasing property tax revenues over the previous year by more than the rate of inflation unless the increase is approved by a majority public vote.

The law contains 14 different exemptions where cities and counties could increase property tax revenues over the previous year by more than the rate of inflation without a public vote, including when property tax revenues increase as new buildings are constructed and new improvements are made to existing buildings. Many of these exemptions are common sense and good public policy.

Does Kansas have a property tax problem?

Yes. Over the last 17 years, Kansas local governments have increased property taxes at a rate that is more than triple the rate of inflation. No reasonable person can look at this and conclude that property taxes are growing at a rate that is sustainable for Kansas families, farmers and small businesses.

Kansas has some of the highest property taxes in the entire nation and in our six-state region (Arkansas, Colorado, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska and Oklahoma). For example, our residential property tax burden is the 15th worst in the nation, our rural commercial property tax burden is the absolute worst in the nation and our urban commercial property tax burden is also the 15th worst in the nation.

If the public vote requirement had been in effect over the last 15 years, property taxes could have been reduced by nearly $489 million for Kansas property families, farmers and small businesses. This would have reduced the property tax burden by nearly $33 million each year from 1999 to 2014.

Is there widespread support for the public vote requirement?

Yes. In a recently-conducted public opinion survey, 76% of voters said that the public vote requirement was a good idea. A strong majority of self-identified Democrats, Republicans and independent voters all voice support for the public vote requirement and the right of voters to vote on property tax increases.

Capture

 

Millennials overtake Baby Boomers as America’s largest generation

April 25, 2016

PewResearch Center by Richard Fry

FT_16_04_25_generations2050

Millennials have surpassed Baby Boomers as the nation’s largest living generation, according to population estimates released this month by the U.S. Census Bureau. Millennials, whom we define as those ages 18-34 in 2015, now number 75.4 million, surpassing the 74.9 million Baby Boomers (ages 51-69). And Generation X (ages 35-50 in 2015) is projected to pass the Boomers in population by 2028.

The Millennial generation continues to grow as young immigrants expand its ranks. Boomers – whose generation was defined by the boom in U.S. births following World War II – are older and their numbers shrinking as the number of deaths among them exceeds the number of older immigrants arriving in the country.

FT_generations-definedGenerations are analytical constructs, and developing a popular and expert consensus on what marks the boundaries between one generation and the next takes time. Pew Research Center has established that the oldest “Millennial” was born in 1981. The Center continues to assess demographic, attitudinal and other evidence on habits and culture that will help to establish when the youngest Millennial was born or even when a new generation begins. To distill the implications of the census numbers for generational heft, this analysis assumes that the youngest Millennial was born in 1997.

Here’s a look at some generational projections:

Millennials

  • With immigration adding more numbers to its group than any other, the Millennial population is projected to peak in 2036 at 81.1 million. Thereafter the oldest Millennial will be at least 56 years of age and mortality is projected to outweigh net immigration. By 2050 there will be a projected 79.2 million Millennials.

FT_16_04_25_generationsBirths

Generation X

  • For a few more years, Gen Xers are projected to remain the “middle child” of generations – caught between two larger generations of the Millennials and the Boomers. They are smaller than Millennials because the generational span of Gen X (16 years) is shorter than the Millennials (17 years). Also, the Gen Xers were born during a period when Americans were having fewer children than later decades. When Gen Xers were born, births averaged around 3.4 million per year, compared with the 3.9 million annual rate during the 1980s and 1990s when Millennials were born.
  • Though the oldest Gen Xer is now 50, the Gen X population will still grow for a few more years. The Gen X population is projected to outnumber the Boomers in 2028 when there will be 64.6 million Gen Xers and 63.7 million Boomers. The Census Bureau projects that the Gen X population will peak at 65.8 million in 2018.

Baby Boomers

  • Baby Boomers have always had an outsized presence compared with other generations. They were the largest generation and peaked at 78.8 million in 1999.
  • There were an estimated 74.9 million Boomers in 2015. By midcentury, the Boomer population will dwindle to 16.6 million.

This post was originally published on Jan. 16, 2015, and updated on April 25, 2016, to indicate that Millennials have officially surpassed Baby Boomers in population.

 

 

Lawrence Board of REALTORS® Releases Home Sales Figures for March 2016

April 26, 2016

MARKET STATS

Homes sales rose by 4.8% in March compared to the prior year. Sales in March 2016 totaled 87 units, up from 83 in 2015.

Among existing homes, 81 units sold in March, an increase of 1.2% from 80 units that sold in 2015. The average sale price of existing homes was $203,227. This represents a decrease of 2.9% from the March 2015 average price of $209,298.

For new construction, 6 sales occurred in March, up from 3 units the prior year, an increase of 100.0%. The average sale price of new homes in March was $303,467, up 12.2% from the same period last year.

A total of 169 contracts for sale were written in March 2016, up from 158 in March 2015. This is an increase of 7.0%. Contracts written during the month reflect, in part, sales that will close in the near future.

 According to Carl Cline, President of the Lawrence Board of REALTORS®,Market activity is high right now, and the success of 2016 will fall largely on the activity in this 2nd quarter of the year.   Home sales in the first 3 months of 2016 were strong at $35 million, but we currently have $43 million under contract, and we’ll see that number double in each of these next few months.  We’re predicting a strong 2nd quarter of home sales.”

The inventory of active listings in the City of Lawrence stood at 265 units at the end of March, which is down from 327 homes that were on the market at the end of March last year. At the current rate of sales, this figure represents 3.0 months’ supply of homes on the market.  “Inventory levels are a constant concern, and so far the new inventory coming into the market is sustaining sales. Buyers are competing for the new homes we see entering the market.  During March, half of the homes that went under contract did so in 12 days or less.  For all of 2016, the median ‘Days on Market’ for contracts written stands at just 17 days.”

For questions and/or comments, please contact LBOR President Carl Cline at 785-218-1340 or cmsellm@gmail.com.

Complete statistical summaries for Lawrence and Douglas County are available at http://MLSStats.LawrenceRealtor.com.  

 

KAR Capitol Report

The regular portion of the 2016 Legislative Session is complete. The Kansas Legislature will now take a few weeks off before returning for the wrap-up session in late April. All legislative action should be completed by mid-May.

Here’s how KAR is promoting and protecting Kansas REALTORS® through political action and advocacy during the 2016 Legislative Session:

1. Opposing Attempts to Increase the Tax Burden on Kansas Property Owners

WHAT’S HAPPENING:
•State tax revenues are significantly under the amount of money that the state previously estimated it would take in this year. If revenues continue to fall below estimates over the next two to three months, the Kansas Legislature may consider increasing income or sales taxes to balance the budget.
•If the Kansas Legislature attempts to increase taxes, they may try to make further reductions to the ability of state income taxpayers to claim the mortgage interest and property tax deductions on their state income tax returns. Eliminating these two very important deductions would lead to a tax increase on Kansas homeowners.

WHAT WE ARE ASKING LAWMAKERS TO DO:
•KAR will push the Kansas Legislature to do no harm to the recovering real estate market by opposing attempts to reopen the state income tax reform debate. Economic growth depends on a stable investment environment with a consistent tax code.

PROGRESS ON THIS ISSUE:
•The Kansas Legislature will need to take action sometime in the next few months to close a projected budget deficit for fiscal year 2017 (starts on July 1, 2016). We will monitor discussions on the budget to defeat any effort to increase income tax revenues by making further reductions to the ability of Kansas homeowners to claim their mortgage interest and property tax deductions.

2. Reducing the Property Tax Burden on Kansas Property Owners

WHAT’S HAPPENING:
•Over the last 18 years, the property tax burden on Kansans has increased by three times the rate of inflation. In 2015, the Kansas Legislature gave voters the right to vote when cities and counties increase property taxes by more than the rate of inflation over the previous year.

WHAT WE ARE ASKING LAWMAKERS TO DO:
•The property tax vote requirement is not currently scheduled to go into effect until January 1, 2018, which gives cities and counties a free pass to increase property taxes over the next two years without a public vote. In addition, the law is riddled with exemptions that are too broad and do not relate to growth and development.
•KAR will push the Kansas Legislature to move up the effective date of the property tax vote requirement on property tax increases to this year and to remove a few of the overly broad exemptions to the law.

PROGRESS ON THIS ISSUE:
•An agreement has been reached with cities and counties to move up the implementation date of the property tax vote requirement by one year to January 1, 2017, to eliminate several loopholes to the law and to add several new exemptions to the law that will allow cities and counties to respond to disasters and respond to development and growth. We anticipate the Legislature will take action on our legislation (Senate Substitute for HB 2088) during the wrap-up session.

3. Protecting Consumer Choice in the Housing Market by Banning Price Control Mandates

WHAT’S HAPPENING:
•Advocacy groups are pushing local governments to adopt “inclusionary zoning” requirements, which would establish sales price limits on a percentage of all new housing units constructed in new housing developments. These “price controls” act as a tax on new housing units and can lead to a significant decrease in the number of housing units built and an increase in the cost of market-rate housing for Kansas families.

WHAT WE ARE ASKING LAWMAKERS TO DO:
•KAR will ask the Kansas Legislature to protect consumer choice in the real estate market and promote affordable housing for middle-class Kansas families by passing legislation to prohibit cities and counties from adopting or enforcing price control mandates on privately-owned property.

PROGRESS ON THIS ISSUE:
•Both the Kansas House and Senate have passed legislation (SB 366) that will prohibit cities and counties from adopting or enforcing price control mandates on privately-owned commercial and residential property. Since there were some minor changes made to the bill by the Kansas House, a conference committee has been appointed to discuss these changes and develop a final version of the legislation. We anticipate the Legislature will pass SB 366 when the Legislature returns for the wrap-up session.

Image

Safety: Priority #1…..

3-25-16

Lawrence Board of REALTORS® Releases Home Sales Figures for February 2016

March 24, 2016

 STATS PIC

Homes sales rose by 13.3% in February compared to the prior year. Sales in February 2016 totaled 51 units, up from 45 in 2015.

Among existing homes, 49 units sold in February, an increase of 25.6% from 39 units that sold in 2015. The average sale price of existing homes was $160,032. This represents an increase of 31.4% from the February 2015 average price of $121,818.

 For new construction, 2 sales occurred in February, down from 6 units the prior year, a decrease of 66.7%. The average sale price of new homes in February was $539,846, up 35.5% from the same period last year.

 A total of 109 contracts for sale were written in February 2016, up from 85 in February 2015. This is an increase of 28.2%. Contracts written during the month reflect, in part, sales that will close in the near future.

 The inventory of active listings in the City of Lawrence stood at 255 units at the end of February, which is down from 325 homes that were on the market at the end of February last year. At the current rate of sales, this figure represents 5.0 months’ supply of homes on the market.

 According to Carl Cline, President of the Lawrence Board of REALTORS®, “The spring market has definitely arrived.  Our local market is emulating what is happening nationally, with a shortage of supply causing upward pressure on pricing as buyers compete for homes.  REALTORS® are busy.  In Lawrence during February, 135 newly listed homes hit the market, and 109 contracts were accepted by sellers.  MLS wide (Lawrence and surrounding areas) we saw 202 new listings in February, with 169 accepted contracts.  Buyers and Sellers need to commit to their REALTOR® of choice now to have the best possible competitive advantage in this tight market.”  

 For questions and/or comments, please contact LBOR President Carl Cline at 785-218-1340 or cmsellm@gmail.com.

 Complete statistical summaries for Lawrence and Douglas County are available at http://MLSStats.LawrenceRealtor.com.  

 

Fair Housing Is In Your Hands

from REALTORMAG.REALTOR.ORG
March/April 2016 Issue

Nearly 50 years since the federal ban on housing discrimination, upholding the law’s spirit remains a challenge. Here’s how to be a fair housing leader.

REALTORMAG

By Graham Wood

Sandra Butler refused to let it slide when a seller she represented last year made what felt like a discriminatory comment. The seller thought the buyers, who had foreignsounding names, were trying to negotiate for too many repairs. “I know how these people are, and they always want something for nothing,” Butler recalls the seller saying.

Butler is African-American. So was her client. And she didn’t want the seller to “think this conversation could be had because we look alike,” she says. Instead of flatly admonishing her client, Butler turned the conversation to fair housing law. “I said, ‘I don’t know the buyers or what they look like. I just know they are ready, willing, and able to purchase, and it’s our duty under the law to make your property available to them,’” says Butler, a sales associate with Sibcy Cline, REALTORS®, in Cincinnati. The deal ultimately fell apart over negotiation terms, but Butler was satisfied that she’d made her client more aware of a seller’s responsibility to abide by the federal Fair Housing Act, which prohibits inequitable treatment in the sale, rental, and financing of homes based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, disability, and the presence of children.

Have you seen discrimination in your market?

9% have.

Source: REALTOR® Magazine survey of 2,300 NAR members

25,000 to 30,000 complaints, annually; 3.7 million estimated instances of discrimination

Source: National Fair Housing Alliance

Each April, REALTORS® celebrate Fair Housing Month to commemorate the law, which was passed in 1968 and amended in 1988. Yet nearly 50 years after its passage, racial and religious tensions continue to dominate national conversations and stoke heated rhetoric in presidential politics. Is that tension having an effect on real estate sales? Apparently not. Housing discrimination is the exception today, according to a survey REALTOR® Magazine conducted with NAR members in February. Of the 2,300 respondents, more than 80 percent said they had not encountered housing discrimination in their market.

That’s great news. And yet, fair housing challenges remain. Violations—and government efforts to enforce the law—continue. Nearly 10 percent of respondents to the survey said they had encountered discrimination in their markets, 18 percent of those saying it happened within the past month or “earlier this year.”

Fair housing organizations receive about 25,000 to 30,000 complaints each year, according to the National Fair Housing Alliance, a coalition of privately run fair housing groups. Yet, testing suggests there are many more instances of discrimination—the NFHA estimates about 3.7 million annually. The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development has conducted thousands of tests in recent years, employing housing organizations to send testers out to view for-sale and rental properties as a means of determining whether landlords, lenders, agents, and others in the real estate community treat protected classes differently.

Cliff Long, CEO of the Birmingham Association of REALTORS® in Alabama, says discrimination in the rental process is the biggest issue in his market. When he was relocating to Birmingham three years ago, he experienced it firsthand. Long, who is African-American, says several landlords wanted him to produce financial records before they would show him rental units—a practice that fair housing groups say is often aimed at minorities only. Having just taken the top job at the association, Long decided not to file a complaint.

Nearly all respondents said if they encountered potential discriminatory language or actions, they’d likely address it the way Butler did—by engaging in some straight talk about the law with their client. Less than 3 percent of respondents to the survey said they’d file a complaint, and less than 1 percent said they’ve ever filed a fair housing complaint.

Do you discuss fair housing with buyers and sellers?

64% do.

Do you or your client bring up fair housing?

71% me. 26% both. 3% client.

Do you discuss fair housing in your office meetings?

64% do.

Source: REALTOR® Magazine survey of 2,300 NAR members

Putting Your Training to Work

As a member of the National Association of REALTORS®, you’ve made a commitment to equal treatment—not just because it’s the law but as part of the REALTORS® Code of Ethics. NAR requires that members stay up to date on the Code, completing training at least every four years. In addition, states and localities often have their own fair housing laws, so state and local associations administer specific fair housing training for their members. Typically, licensees are required to take a two- or three-hour course every two to four years.

So there’s little doubt that when clients ask questions about quality of schools, local demographics, and neighborhood safety, you know to refer them to reliable information sources for answers rather than give your opinion. Resist the temptation to skirt the subject, says Mabel Guzman, CIPS, a sales associate at properties in Chicago. You’re not teaching them anything by being coy. Be frank about why you can’t answer certain questions. Seize the opportunity to explain fair housing laws and why it would be illegal to offer your opinion.

Curiously, more than 30 percent of respondents to REALTOR® Magazine’s survey said they don’t talk about fair housing issues with buyers and sellers. Whether that’s because they don’t encounter discriminatory behavior or because they’re too uncomfortable to challenge that behavior is not clear. It can be tempting to overlook questions or statements from clients in order to avoid an awkward exchange that could affect your business relationship. Addressing such issues in a nonconfrontational way, with fair housing law as the framework, can help.

The Challenges Ahead

When you’re working with first-time buyers, particularly from new immigrant populations, you may need to actively educate your clients about fair housing law. Immigrants are an increasing target for discrimination in real estate, contends Lisa Rice, NFHA executive vice president, and many are unfamiliar with their rights under the law. “If no one is mean or disrespectful,” she says, “it’s not the first thing on your mind that maybe that house wasn’t made available to you because you were being discriminated against. Trained real estate practitioners can recognize discrimination and be part of how we bring awareness to the public.” The Alliance expects to see a rise in national origin–related cases in the coming years, Rice says.

As a Muslim woman living in the south, Firdaus Rahman, CRS, GRI, a sales associate at RE/MAX Partners in Mobile, Ala., admits she’s worried that Islamophobia—a hot-button issue in the 2016 presidential race—is becoming more acceptable and leads to unfair treatment. Rahman has been teaching fair housing and diversity courses through the Alabama Real Estate Commission since 2002, but the curriculum doesn’t go deeply into religion. She says the training needs an overhaul to reflect new issues surfacing in the field.

“You have to understand where people from different cultures are coming from,” Rahman says, adding that sensitivity to certain holidays and holy days is an important part of working with clients.

Also, because some cultures don’t participate in banking and savings in ways that are customary in the U.S., landlords, lenders, and real estate practitioners may have to educate their clients about U.S. customs or even adjust their expectations. “When immigration reform begins, we’re going to need a lot of education,” Long says. “You can bet fair housing is going to be front and center, and we’re going to be in a bad position if we’re not ready to tackle this issue. I’d like to play a proactive role rather than a reactive role.”

Brokers can take the lead on that front and establish relationships with local fair housing organizations to get a better look at the issues facing local markets. After the NFHA filed discrimination lawsuits against several brokerages nationwide in 2007, including one in the Detroit area, Michigan REALTORS® partnered with fair housing groups around the state to bring regulators and practitioners together. The association developed a program to allow brokers to be voluntarily tested by fair housing groups for informational purposes, hoping it would foster more collaboration on training in the industry. “Part of the testing was about demystifying our relationship with fair housing centers,” says Brian Westrin, the association’s director of legal affairs. “There was a lot of unknown there about whether brokers could reach out and bring fair housing centers into their office for education.”

Addressing the Affordability Barrier

One of the underlying goals of fair housing law has been ending segregated housing patterns in the United States, but census data show the law has fallen short. So last year, President Barack Obama announced a new rule requiring local governments that receive federal housing funds to report how they use those funds to foster more integrated communities.

Has a transaction of yours ever failed to close because of a fair housing issue?

11% say yes.

Respondents who answered yes often cited their refusal to work with someone they perceived to be discriminatory.

Source: REALTOR® Magazine survey of 2,300 NAR members

Lack of affordable housing can perpetuate segregation when it prevents protected classes from moving up the housing ladder. It’s a problem facing cities across the country, but none more acutely than San Francisco, where the median price was $940,000 in the fourth quarter of 2015. That’s why REALTORS® there have banded together to come up with solutions to the growing affordability crisis.

The real estate industry in San Francisco relies heavily on all-cash buyers—many from Asia—which pushes up prices and leaves other groups at a disadvantage, says Eugene Pak, president of the San Francisco Association of REALTORS® and sales manager at Climb Real Estate. One of SFAR’s primary goals this year is to work with local officials on a program to fasttrack the permitting process for residential developments that will deliver a certain percentage of affordable units. It currently takes eight to 15 years to build a large development because of the intense permitting process, Pak says. “We don’t only care about the needs of our millionaire clients,” he adds. “We believe in housing for all.”

Countering a Charge

If you’ve ever been on the receiving end of a fair housing complaint, you know how badly it can rock your world. Whatever the circumstances, you’ll have a better outcome if you take a serious, straightforward approach. Start by contacting your attorney. Then, call your local or state association’s legal hotline for advice on next steps. You’ll want to gather records of all contacts you’ve had with the complainant. That’ll be easier to do if you have a system for keeping track of all your client interactions, including e-mails, text messages, and signed agreements and contracts.

Once an investigation starts, it’s important to stay out of the way and let the investigators find out what happened, says Idaho practitioner Steve Osburn, who faced a complaint against his former company.

In 2008, a local fair housing group charged that one of his agents tried to steer sales in a new housing community toward people 55 and over. The Intermountain Fair Housing Council in Boise was performing testing in the community, which the developer had been advertising as an active-adult community, though it did not qualify for the Housing for Older Persons Act exemption to the Fair Housing Act. Osburn—at the time broker-owner of Windermere Real Estate/Capital Group Inc. in Boise—says the complaint was slim on details, and he was confident the agent had done nothing wrong. He fully cooperated with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s investigation. “You don’t want to push too hard against the complaint or the investigation,” he says. “You don’t want to look like you have something to hide.”

The council dropped its claim with HUD but, nevertheless, filed a $300,000 lawsuit against Osburn’s company. During the discovery phase, Osburn’s attorney showed that HUD hadn’t found evidence of wrongdoing by the agent. The attorney said HUD was about to side with Osburn when the council dropped its claim. Osburn settled the lawsuit for $500 and admitted no wrongdoing.

“From a broker’s perspective, educate your agents frequently and talk about fair housing openly so they have good information,” says Osburn, now a broker-associate with Better Homes and Gardens 43° North in Meridian, Idaho. “Second, never roll over and just accept a complaint—but do allow the investigation to get the facts.”

Staying Within the Law

Some behaviors might not strike consumers or real estate professionals as clear-cut violations of the federal Fair Housing Act, which prohibits housing discrimination based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, disability, and familial status. But HUD’s discrimination studies have found these common—yet often overlooked—infractions that you should be attuned to. Here are ways to avoid overstepping the law:
•If you ask clients to obtain a prequalification letter from a lender before showing them homes, apply that standard to everyone. Even if clients promise they have the ability to purchase, don’t give them a pass, or a case could be made that you offer differing levels of service. Whatever processes you use for one client, use for all.
•Don’t write listing copy that makes a judgment about the type of buyer who would be most interested in the home. For example, saying a home is “perfect for joggers” could be seen as excluding people with certain disabilities. Describe the property as being located “next to a jogging trail” rather than the person it would appeal to.
•Let the clients bring up whether they want to live near certain amenities, such as houses of worship, cultural institutions, or playgrounds. Making the suggestion yourself could be considered “steering” clients toward certain neighborhoods—a definite violation.

The country has come a long way over the past half-century when racial steering and disparate lending practices were common. And REALTORS® are on the forefront. But in an increasingly diverse country—where taking the first step toward buying or even renting can be a daunting task—you have an opportunity to do more: Teach your neighbors about what fairness in the real estate transaction looks like and empower those who’ve faced prejudice to challenge unequal treatment. Are you making the most of your platform?

Image

CRS 201 Offered at KCRAR

CRS 201 Flyer (final)

Lawrence Board of REALTORS® Releases Home Sales Figures for January 2016

February 29, 2016

Stats

Homes sales fell by 23.1% in January compared to the prior year. Sales in January 2016 totaled 40 units, down from 52 in 2015.

Among existing homes, 35 units sold in January, a decrease of 32.7% from 52 units that sold in 2015. The average sale price of existing homes was $182,842. This represents a decrease of 5.1% from the January 2015 average price of $192,746.

For new construction, 5 sales occurred in January, up from 0 units the prior year. The average sale price of new homes in January was $407,860.

A total of 50 contracts for sale were written in January 2016, down from 75 in January 2015. This is a decrease of 33.3%. Contracts written during the month reflect, in part, sales that will close in the near future.

The inventory of active listings in the City of Lawrence stood at 260 units at the end of January, which is down from 286 homes that were on the market at the end of January last year. At the current rate of sales, this figure represents 6.5 months’ supply of homes on the market.

According to Carl Cline, President of the Lawrence Board of REALTORS®, “The market softened a bit out of the gate for 2016; however, February sales data indicates the market is trending stronger in these early months of first quarter. The spring market is already here and the indices project another solid year of home sales in 2016. Our current supply levels are constricted and that is a concern as we move into the busiest selling season of the year. ”

For questions and/or comments, please contact LBOR President Carl Cline at 785-218-1340, or cmsellm@gmail.com.